The Psychological Effects Of Of Nutrition And Exercise

Mental balance is an extremely important part of leading a healthy, happy and productive life. There are three psychological issues that all of us deal with at some level during different stages of our lives that can upset this mental balance. These issues are stress, depression and anxiety. Western medicine has traditionally prescribed medication and counseling to try and deal with these issues for many years. The drugs used to treat these conditions of the mind unfortunately can have severe side effects. Counseling can provide some help but many patients can’t afford the cost of continued counseling and many just abandon the treatment after some period of time. Fortunately recent scientific studies have been showing that nutrition†¦show more content†¦The mind is about mental processes, thought and consciousness. The body is about the physical aspects of the brain-neurons and how the brain is structured. Throughout time our ancestors have exemplified the aspect of mind over matter. An example being the Egyptians turning stone into large cut blocks which they used to build the pyramids. The mind is a powerhouse that lets one have the ability to discriminate and reason. In todays society there is an entire career field to go into that deals with mental stability. The reason being is that without mental stability our ability to reason is damaged and our lives are thrown off balance. This will lead to mistakes made in everyday life. Exercise and nutrition have now been scientifically proven to help combat against the three main mental imbalances of stress, depression, and anxiety disorders. Depression stress and anxiety are no joke, as they can kill you! Have you ever found yourself with sweaty hands on a first date or felt your heart pound during a horror film? This is called stress, stress is an automatic response developed in our ancient ancestors as a way to protect them from predators and other threats. With that being said you likely will not be in a position where you are actually being hunted. However, you probably do encou nter many everyday stressors that cause your mind and body to react as if it were being hunted. Stress can magnify your feelings and emotions. If you are living

Media Innovations Free Essays

Mr. Clayt Shirky had a talk about the fast-growing innovation of media this past few years. He also discussed on how media shifted the user’s way of communication, and its effect in our lives consciously and unconsciously. We will write a custom essay sample on Media Innovations or any similar topic only for you Order Now There were innovations such as printing press, telephones, film and televisions. He mentioned that media that is good at creating conversations is no good at creating groups, and that is how he described the past medias, but everything changed when internet entered our society. Internet became the king of everything it literally replaced every innovation such as television, telephone, typewriter, and films. Almost everything migrated to internet. Why? because people are most likely to use their phones/computer/laptop more than these innovations. Yes, internet is useful, in fact it won’t be patronized if it’s not useful. A scenario was also presented wherein during an earthquake in china, some citizen uploaded a video live which helped the world become aware on what’s happening to them, with that I believe rescue can be more responsive because internet can send real time updates but beware of fake news. One should verify things first before believing and be responsible to know more about the certain issues. It was also mentioned that because of the real time post about the earthquakes, donations were collected since people saw how big the disaster was. I’ve experienced that scenario here in the Philippines during the typhoon Ondoy and Yolanda, concerned citizens posted a video about the current event in their place and with that, people from all over the world sympathized the victims and prayed for them some even gave their clothes as their donation. The best part was Pope John Paul II heard about the victims and rushed over to the Philippines to suffer with the victims and pray for them. But from every benefit we get from internet there is still a down side of it. For example, he mentioned about the video voting wherein if one is to vote a certain candidate, they have to film their own action then upload it to a certain website. For me, this process is too risky because in the present days, vote buying is really a trend. If a candidate noticed that you did not vote that person and received a pay, then your life may be at risk. I believe voting should be in private to avoid conflicts, anger and hate between the government and its people. Another example is when Obama announced that he was going to shift his vote to FISA which caused misunderstanding towards the people. But later on, he explained himself through internet saying that the campaign understood that their role was to convene but not control. Lastly, during the china earthquake incident, the government prevented the citizens to spread the news through internet and whoever post an information may be imprisoned. For me this is against their freedom to express. One has a privilege to express themselves without any barriers especially the government. I believe that change is the only constant thing in the world and that is what improves our society. With that we can portray that media makes history by the transformation of the way of communication and how people uses the available resources just like broadcasting news its either through radio or through newsprint there is no interaction between the media towards its audience unlike the 20th century media landscape, we can freely comment and suggest things through the use of internet. Media shifted from a one-way conversation to an interactive one. One should also be aware that internet may cause negativity in many ways such as abuse of the usage through bullying and spreading of fake news, misunderstanding and so on. We should be aware and prevent the government to control social media, because each one of us has the freedom of information. And every right we have, should be used and nurtured. But always keep in mind that discipline is what makes things useful and lasting. We should all be a disciplined user of the technology/media that we have today so that it will be a benefit and not a destruction. How to cite Media Innovations, Papers

Nationalism in German Music During the Early Roman Essay Example For Students

Nationalism in German Music During the Early Roman Essay Until the nineteenth century, music was generally regarded as an international language. Folk music had always been in place and linked directly with particular regions. On a larger scale though, European music was a device for expression through the application of Italian techniques and styles. In other words, its technical vocabulary was Italian, and from the time of the early baroque, European music, in general, had evolved its styles and technical devices from the developments of Italian composers. Furthermore, court opera was nearly always performed in Italian, whether in Dresden or in London, no matter who composed it or where it was performed. For example, in 1855, Queen Victoria suggested to Richard Wagner that he translate his opera Tannhauser into Italian so that it could secure a production in London. Thus, European music, regardless of where it was composed could be (and was) performed throughout Europe and understood through the common Italian commands, descriptions, and styles. It was unacceptable for most to compose in any other way. The international idea began to collapse in the early nineteenth century as embattled nations or nations subjugated by a foreign invader began to think of music as an expression of their own national identity, personality, or as a way of voicing national aspirations. In Germany, the ideas of nationalism were prevented from finding an outlet in the world of political ideology and instead found outlets in music. This started in a very subtle manor. Take for example the increasing use, by Beethoven, of the German language in his instructions in his music. In his Adieux Sonata (op. 81a), Beethovens farewell to the Archduke Rudolph, the master progressively uses increasing amounts of German in his instructions and by the third movement, little Italian at all. Sonatas written a few years later are designated for the Hammerklavier and not for the pianoforte, Italian for piano. Such subtle changes in traditional composition direction foreshadowed ever-increasing tendencies toward German nationalistic ideas in music. As Henry Raynor puts it, the Napoleonic invasions which turned Beethoven from a simple revolutionary into a patriotic Austrian revolutionary seem to have made him feel that his own language was a perfectly satisfactory way of telling pianists how he wanted his music played. These early feelings of nationalism, if not just for Beethoven, stemmed from the years of unity under the auspices of Napoleons Empire, which gave a considerable portion of central Europe reason to realize their collective similarities. This large area shared a common language and historical legacy. Traditions were similar as were aspirations. Indeed, the complex that was to become the German Empire presented a more or less homogeneous state, united by language and culture but forced by political organization into political disunity Nonetheless, the idea of German unity had surfaced years earlier, long before the revolutionary borders of Central Europe were rationalized by Napoleon and before Beethovens use of German vocabulary for instruction in his music. The prominent German Enlightenment thinkers Johann Gottfried Herder and Johann Gottlieb Fichte had espoused that nationalism in Germany was found in the unity of culture and not in the political situation of the region. Herder though that if the German-speaking world obtained a unity of culture and education, political unity would follow. More importantly, it was the personality of the German people or Volk and their awareness of a common culture that would create the less vital political unity. Herder was concerned with the cultural character exclusively in his nationalism. Also, his brand of philosophical nationalism was applicable to others, and not exclusively Germans. Somewhat conversely, Fichte believed that a nation was not merely the combination of people and a certain geographical area but was a spiritual unity created through shared culture and aspirations, a result of religious, social, economic, and political pressures. Fichte was twenty years younger than Herder and promoted a more intense brand of German nationalism that surfaced later in the nineteenth century. Of great importance though, Fichte, unlike Herder, attributed to the Germans an originality and a genius not possessed by other peoples. Conversely altogether is the thinking of Hegel. His viewpoint was that the state, its policies, and the order it enforces were the only embodiment of nationalism or national culture. In other words, it was the duty of the state to ensure the independence of the arts and have the state maintain the embodiment of national culture. It can be assumed that this view was not appealing Beethoven or Wagner. Thus, the collision of cultural and idealistic nationalism with the ambitions of Napoleonic France effectively caused the German people to justify the political actions of their rulers, if not to find expression in a political sense. The German states were without a center without Austrian influence, as the Congress of Vienna had refused any Austrian influence in Western Europe. This created a gap, which remained until the creation of the German Empire under Prussian leadership. However, the cultural unity that existed in Germany, the unity of a common language, national folklore and national traditions, which were claimed as the real basis for national identity according to Fichte and Herder, all set the background for a desire for political unity. Analysis Of The Underlying Social Psychology EssayThe Austro-Prussian War of 1866, left Austria defeated and deprived of all influence among any German states and saw the formation of the North German Confederation under Prussian leadership. This left Brahms annoyed with both sides because he felt who would lead a united Germany, either Prussia or Austria, was of little consequence. It was the Franco-Prussian War of 1870 that really stirred him. According to Raynor, he told a friend, Georg Henschel, a famous singer-conductor, that his first impulse was to join the Army. Also, the great statesman, Bismarck, had become an idol to him. Brahms celebrated the victory over France with a work entitled Triumphlied. This work, combing chorus and orchestra, used biblical words to connect the ideas of German nationalism with Old Testament Hebrew patriotism. This conviction that German composers wrote music that existed on a much higher intellectual level than the music of other nations and contained the individuality of the composer was not new. Charles Burney wrote in the 1780s of nationalistic qualities in music, years before anyone thought of music as expression of national qualities. However, by the second quarter of the nineteenth century, composers gradually began to ask if musicians in other countries could really understand German music. In other words, the supposed intellectual loftiness of German music may be difficult for other nations to perform properly and with the correct German spirit. Wagner noted this after performances of Beethoven symphonies by the Conservatoire Concerts Society Orchestra during his first stay in Paris. He was impressed by the performances, but felt that there were deeper questions that needed to be asked. The French had performed these pieces accurately but with injustice to the text of the music. He was surprised by the French performances of Beethovens strong German spirit: They love to admire and applaud things beautiful and unknown from abroad. As to witness the reception that has been so quickly accorded to German instrumental music. Though, apart from this, whether one could say that the French completely understand German music is another question, the answer to which must be doubtful. Certainly it would be wrong to maintain that the enthusiasm evoked by the Conservatoire orchestras performance of a Beethoven Symphony is affected. Yet when one listens to this or that enthusiast airing the various opinions, ideas, and conceits which a symphony has suggested to him, one realizes at once that the German genius is far from being completely grasped. It is likely that examples of this same type of incomprehension could be found equally as many times by German listeners at German performances of German works. It is interesting to note that Wagner wrote uncomprehendingly of Haydns symphonies. Schumann and other contemporaries found little more than elegance and beauty in Mozarts instrumental works. Spohr and his contemporaries found little in the latter works of Beethoven that was easily enjoyable. Additionally, German musicians felt that because their music was superior, if only their minds, that they had already mastered the music of other nations. The incomprehension witnessed in France by Wagner was not simply the foreignness of a different musical language. Rather, it was the feeling that the Germans just thought in music more deeply than the musicians of other nations felt it necessary to do so. This is significant for a time when music, more than any other medium, was the outlet and central unifying force of a people not united politically. The nineteenth century saw many more changes than the move from international to national music. The examples used here of Germany are but a small fraction of this phenomenon that occurred in the nations of all Europe during the century. Italy had its music nationalism, as did Hungary, Russia, and others. All of these nations had their own unique sets of circumstances and interesting composers. Other areas of music witnessed dramatic changes that can be traced to the spark of nationalism. Just as there were numerous experiments in politics across the continent, so to was there experimentation and innovation in music during the century. The employment of new harmonic structure and rhythmic techniques to give orchestral music greater color and intensity was one of the greatest of these. New instruments were added and older ones were redesigned to make them more sonorous and flexible. Also, different combinations of instruments were used to create new orchestral sounds. Whats more, the cultural and political nationalism of the century created the political and cultural environment (in a broad and general sense) of the twentieth century. The nineteenth century created the musical environment in which twentieth century musicians grew-up. The opera and concert organizations, the system of chamber music performances, and the alternative attractions of music comedy, variety, and popular music in all its forms were developments of music phenomenon that first manifested themselves in the nineteenth century. In the nineteenth century, music was harnessed to the cause of nationalism, and played a role whose importance can probably never be accurately assessed in stirring up nationalist feeling and creating a national self-consciousness.